Two tools, one licence, and nobody quite sure which to use
If you have rolled out Microsoft 365, you have SharePoint and Teams. Both let your people store and share documents. Both show up in searches. Both are accessible on any device. And both, without clear guidance, get used interchangeably — which is where the problems start.
We see this regularly with the UK organisations we work with. Files saved in Teams that nobody outside the team can find. SharePoint sites with folder structures six levels deep that made sense to the person who built them and no one else. Documents duplicated across both platforms. And staff who, faced with the choice, just email the file instead.
"The question is not which tool is better. It is understanding what each tool was designed to do — and making sure your organisation uses them accordingly."
The good news: SharePoint and Teams are not competing tools. They are complementary ones. Understanding the relationship between them is the key to getting document management right inside Microsoft 365.
They were built to solve different problems
Before deciding which to use, it helps to understand what each one was actually designed for.
- SharePoint is a document management and intranet platform. It has been the foundation of Microsoft's content management offering for over two decades.
- It is designed for structured, governed content — policies, procedures, contracts, templates, published resources. Things that need to be findable by more than one team, managed with metadata, and retained according to a policy.
- SharePoint gives you granular permissions, content types, metadata columns, retention labels, versioning, and a search index that spans your entire organisation.
- It is the right place for content that belongs to the organisation — not just to a single team.
- Teams is a communication and collaboration platform. It brings together chat, video, meetings, and file sharing in one place.
- Behind the scenes, every Teams channel has a SharePoint document library automatically created for it. When you save a file in Teams, it is stored in SharePoint — you are accessing it via the Teams interface.
- Teams is designed for active, project-based collaboration. Working documents, meeting notes, drafts in progress, files that a specific team is actively working on together.
- It is the right place for content that belongs to a team's workflow — not content that needs to be discoverable organisation-wide.
How they compare across the dimensions that matter
For IT and operations leaders evaluating where to direct their teams, the differences are most significant in these areas:
| SharePoint | Microsoft Teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Organisational content, intranets, published resources, policies | Team collaboration, active projects, working documents |
| Audience | Whole organisation or defined audiences | Specific team or channel members |
| Findability | High — rich metadata, search index, content types | Limited — search is scoped to the team |
| Governance | Strong — retention policies, sensitivity labels, lifecycle management | Lighter — governed via Teams admin and underlying SharePoint |
| Permissions | Granular — site, library, folder and item level | Tied to team and channel membership |
| Version history | Full version history, major/minor versions, approval workflows | Version history available but less prominent |
| Underlying storage | SharePoint document libraries | SharePoint document libraries (via Teams) |
| User experience | Browser or SharePoint app | Integrated within the Teams interface |
Use the right tool for the right type of content
Rather than mandating one tool or the other across the board, the most effective approach is to define clearly where different types of content belong. Here is how we typically advise UK organisations to think about it:
Teams and SharePoint are not rivals — they are the same platform
The most important thing to understand is that Teams does not replace SharePoint. Every document saved in a Teams channel is stored in a SharePoint document library. Teams is simply a different interface for accessing and collaborating on SharePoint content.
This matters because it changes the question entirely. Rather than choosing one or the other, the real challenge is designing a content architecture that uses both correctly — and making sure your people know which type of content belongs where.
"Teams is the front door. SharePoint is the filing system. You need both — but only if the filing system is well organised."
The organisations that get this right tend to have a clear, documented content strategy that defines content types, ownership, storage location, and retention. Those that struggle are usually the ones that have let the platform grow organically without that structure in place.
The latter is more common — and it creates real problems when it comes to compliance, findability, and increasingly, AI readiness. Microsoft 365 Copilot reasons over your SharePoint content. If that content is unstructured, inconsistently named, and scattered between Teams and SharePoint without logic, Copilot's ability to help you is significantly diminished.
Five steps to a clear document management strategy
If your organisation is unsure where documents should live — or if you are seeing the symptoms of unmanaged content, such as duplication, poor findability, and staff reverting to email — these are the steps that make the biggest difference:
Where Cordapse can help
Getting SharePoint and Teams working together effectively — with the right structure, governance, and adoption — is one of the most impactful things a UK organisation can do with its Microsoft 365 investment. It improves findability, reduces compliance risk, and sets the foundation for AI tools like Microsoft 365 Copilot to actually perform.
At Cordapse, we have spent over 30 years helping organisations get more from Microsoft's technology. We work with you to assess your current content landscape, design an information architecture that fits the way your people actually work, and implement it with the change management needed to make it stick — without jargon, without waste.
Not sure where your documents should live?
Book a free, no-obligation consultation and we will help you map out a content strategy that works for your organisation — clearly, practically, and without unnecessary complexity.
Book a free consultation →
